Skip to main content

Adapting to Climate Change: Comparison of Case Studies

Print PDF

Adapting to Climate Change: Comparison of Case Studies

Publication
Citation

Campos, Inês; Kiat Ng; Andreas Hastrup Clemmensen et. al. 2016: Adapting to Climate Change: Comparison of Case Studies. BASE-Deliverable 5.5 under Grant Agreement No. 308337 (Project BASE).

This document aims to offer a synthesis and discussion of the methodological process and results of implementing climate change adaptation case study research, reporting on the key messages and lessons learnt through a critical comparison of case studies that equally accounts for the stakeholders' perspectives. The deliverable is structured in four chapters. Chapter 1 provides a critical assessment of the Case Study Living Document- a methodological instrument developed in the context of a collaborative case study research, and provides the framework for the analyses developed in the following chapters. Chapter 2 is a comparative synthesis and meta-analysis of key messages from WP5 case study research results. Chapter 3 provides a meta-discussion on participatory experiences, which adds to the work developed in deliverable 5.3 (i.e. Participation in Climate Change Adaptation). Chapter 4 is centred on the perspectives of BASE case study stakeholders, and discusses and analyses the main challenges, successes and opportunities for climate change adaptation from the perspective of the stakeholders involved throughout BASE casework. The conclusions of the four chapters are distilled in the final conclusion, which offers insights regarding top-down/bottom-up dynamics, as well as contributions for future research. This final section equally offers a synthesis of how case study research tools and incremental innovations to methods and tools for climate change adaptation research and practice may inform the European Environmental Agency (EEA) and the European Adaptation platform Climate-ADAPT.

Contact

More content from this project

Language
English
Authorship
Inês Campos
Kiat Ng
Andreas Hastrup Clemmensen
Gil Penha Lopes
Credits

Contributing authors:

Ad Jensen, Aline Chiabai, Ana Iglesias, Anders Branth Pedersen, André Vizinho, Anne Jensen, Anne-Mari Rytkönen,Bjørn Bedsted, Chiara Mazzetti, Duncan Russel, Eliška Lorencová, Femke Schasfoort, Filipe Moreira Alves, Grit Martinez, Hans Sanderson; Helle Ørsted Nielsen, Hilden Mikael Hugo Oliveira, Jenny Tröltzsch, Maailke Van Aalast, Mäkinen Kirs; Margaretha Breil, Marianne Zandersen, Marie Hubatová, Mark Zandvoort, Mette Termansen, Milla Mäenpää, Nico Stelljes, Oliver Gebhardt, Olivia Rendon-Thompson, Pedro Iglesias, Roos M. den Uyl, Rutger Van der Brugge, Sahran Higgins, Sebastien Foudi, Søren Gram, Tim Taylor, Volker Meyer, Zuzana Harmáčková

Funding
Year
2016
Dimension
122 pp.
Project
Project ID
Table of contents
Keywords
adaptation, climate change, sustainability, Europe, cost-benefit analysis, stakeholder engagement, policy effectiveness, policy integration, knowledge transfer, bottom-up, top-down, environmental governance, stakeholder, civil society, decision maker
Europe, USA, Singapore, Brazil, Peru
case study