Skip to main content

A Circular Plastic Economy Should Account for all Societal Costs

Cover of a publication from 'Cambridge Prisms' titled 'Plastics.' The cover features a gradient background transitioning from deep red to blue, with white lines cutting across the lower half. The title 'Plastics' is displayed in simple white text.

© Cambridge University Press 2024

A Circular Plastic Economy Should Account for all Societal Costs

Publication
Citation

Syberg K, Gündoğdu S, Olsen T, et al. A circular plastic economy should account for all societal costs. Cambridge Prisms: Plastics. Published online 2025:1-10. doi:10.1017/plc.2025.10019

To enable a genuine shift toward a circular plastic economy, the UN plastics treaty must confront two critical structural barriers: fossil fuel and plastic production subsidies, and the failure to internalize the true societal and environmental costs of plastic. Without addressing these root causes, efforts to end plastic pollution risk falling short, the authors of this article argue. Among them Ecologic Institute's Doris Knoblauch.

Subsidies keep primary plastics artificially cheap

The article highlights how current global policies largely fail to tackle the systemic economic conditions underpinning the linear plastic economy. While numerous initiatives focus on waste management and recycling, they often ignore the artificially low cost of primary plastics – a result of extensive subsidies and the externalization of health and environmental damages.

Plastic is kept "cheap" through direct and indirect subsidies, with fossil fuel support alone surpassing $1 trillion globally in 2022. At the same time, mounting evidence points to massive unaccounted costs: from marine environmental damage (estimated at $2.5 trillion/year) to plastic-related health impacts (e.g. $250 billion in U.S. health costs due to endocrine disruptors in 2018).

The authors argue that these distortions block innovation, entrench the dominance of single-use plastics, and hinder the scale-up of circular business models. Transitioning to a more regenerative and sustainable plastic system therefore requires bold policy measures that reshape market incentives and dismantle harmful subsidies.

Policy Recommendations for the UN Plastics Treaty

  • Phase out fossil fuel and plastic production subsidies that artificially lower primary plastic prices.
  • Introduce a polymer production fee, calibrated to cover the real societal and environmental externalities.
  • Mandate a global phase-out of single-use plastics (SUPs), supported by reporting and review mechanisms.

These actions are presented as essential steps to “destabilize” the existing socio-technical regime and build a new foundation for a circular plastic economy.

True circularity requires full cost accounting

Contact

Doris Knoblauch
Co-Coordinator Plastics
Coordinator Urban & Spatial Governance
Senior Fellow
Language
English
Authorship
Kristian Syberg (Roskilde University)
Sedat Gündoğdu (Cukurova University)
Tara Olsen (University of Copenhagen)
Nikoline Oturai (Roskilde University)
Tony R. Walker (Dalhousie University)
Ellen Palm (Roskilde University)
Thomas Budde Christensen (Roskilde University)
Neil Tangri (University of California and Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives)
Published in
Cambridge Prisms: Plastics
Published by
Year
Dimension
10 pp.
ISSN
2755-094X
DOI
Keywords