Skip to main content

Inclusion of Downstream Products in CBAM

Photo: Canva.com, Cover: UBA, 2025

Inclusion of Downstream Products in CBAM

Assessment and operationalisation of relevant criteria

Publication
Citation

Montrone, Lorenzo et al. 2025: Inclusion of downstream products in CBAM. Assessment and operationalisation of relevant criteria. Interim report. German Environment Agency: Dessau-Roßlau.

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) imposes a carbon price on imports of selected products into the EU market, with the aim of creating a level playing field between domestic production and imports. According to Annex I of Regulation 2023/956, which establishes CBAM, 573 products, mainly from upstream sectors, are currently covered. The regulation simultaneously recognises the need to assess and implement an expansion of the scope to downstream products.

The present report discusses criteria that could be applied to inform decisions on the inclusion of downstream products in the CBAM. It examines the relevance and suitability of different criteria, as well as the availability and reliability of data to operationalise them.

The authors identify and discuss five main criteria:

  • whether a product contains a significant share of at least one CBAM good;
  • whether a product is relevant in terms of emissions;
  • whether a product is exposed to carbon leakage;
  • whether the inclusion of a product does not create excessive administrative burden;
  • whether the inclusion of a product helps prevent circumvention.

The report also discusses various options for operationalising these criteria. In addition, it provides examples of how such criteria can be applied to a limited number of product groups and examines possible ways to combine them. However, the report does not provide a final recommendation on the criteria for including downstream products in CBAM. Instead, it aims to outline the operating space within which possible criteria can be selected and combined, thereby establishing a general foundation for the discussion on downstream expansion.

The broad spectrum of criteria and potential operationalisation and combination rules discussed in the report requires careful prioritisation of objectives. There are inherent trade-offs between broad coverage of products and the associated increase in administrative burden. The criteria examined in this report could potentially lead to a prioritisation list to guide decisions on which product should be included first within the CBAM scope. Ideally, such a scope expansion would be implemented over time, allowing necessary insights to emerge through cooperation with industry associations, trade partners and regulated entities.

CBAM needs clear criteria to prioritise downstream products for targeted and practical inclusion in its scope.

Contact

More content from this project

Language
English
Authorship
Benjamin Görlach
Lorenzo Montrone (The Climate Desk)
Andreas Wehrl (The Climate Desk)
Funding
Published in
CLIMATE CHANGE, 73|2025
Published by
Year
Dimension
39 pp.
ISSN
1862-4359
DOI
Project
Project ID
Table of contents
Keywords
CBAM, Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, CO₂ border adjustment, EU climate policy, downstream products, CBAM extension, product prioritisation, carbon leakage, CO₂ price, emission-intensive products, import regulation, competitive conditions, CBAM criteria catalogue, circumvention, administrative burden, data availability, emissions relevance, product group analysis, industry associations, trading partners, regulatory framework, European Union, EU internal market, EU trading partners, third countries, international supply chains, global trade, EU regulation, European industry, non-EU exporters, international climate policy
Europe
Criteria analysis, operationalisation of criteria, data availability check, emissions assessment, carbon leakage assessment, product group screening, prioritisation methods, combinatorial assessment, regulatory analysis, scenario analysis, qualitative analysis, quantitative indicator assessment, stakeholder dialogue, policy analysis