Skip to main content

The Do’s and Don’ts of a Buyers’ Club

 

Cover © CAFAMORE 2026, Photo via Canva

The Do’s and Don’ts of a Buyers’ Club

Recommendations for an EU Buyers’ Club for Carbon Farming

Publication
Citation

Gardiner, J., McDonald, H., Scheid, A., Lanckriet, E., Martel, S., Tronquet, C., & Lesschen, J. P. (2026). The Do's and Don'ts of a Buyers' Club: Recommendations for an EU Buyers' Club for Carbon Farming. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20153020

As the European Union advances the implementation of the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulation, attention is increasingly shifting from certification rules and supply towards demand and financing: who will finance carbon farming activities, and under what conditions?

This policy brief, developed within the Horizon Europe project CAFAMORE, examines the proposed EU Buyers’ Club for carbon farming. The brief sets out how the Club should be designed to support early demand for CRCF carbon farming certificates while ensuring environmental integrity and that it benefits farmers.

The key recommendations include:

  • Define the Buyers’ Club as a learning and transition mechanism, not as a long-term solution for financing the agricultural transition. The Club can support early CRCF implementation and act as a practical stepping stone towards compliance policies.
  • Build a strategic portfolio of different CRCF activities and projects, rather than buying only the cheapest certificates available. Funding should prioritise additional, high-impact activities, maximising learning outcomes.  
  • Don’t treat all CRCF certificates as interchangeable. Carbon farming activities differ in permanence, reversal risk, monitoring complexity and co-benefits.  
  • Clarify what claims buyers can make, including for Scope 3 reporting and carbon credits, as well as for co-funded projects, while avoiding a focus on offsetting use cases.  
  • Use public support to unlock additional private finance, rather than replace it, while ensuring that private buyers cannot claim mitigation outcomes that they only marginally financed.  
  • Avoid market structures that weaken farmers’ bargaining power or concentrate influence among a small number of intermediaries, MRV providers or project developers.  
The brief sets out how the Club should be designed to support early demand for CRCF carbon farming certificates while ensuring environmental integrity and that it benefits farmers.

More content from this project

Language
English
Authorship
Edouard Lanckriet (Agrosolutions)
Simon Martel (Institute for Climate Economics - I4CE)
Clothilde Tronquet (Institute for Climate Economics - I4CE)
Jan Peter Lesschen (Wageningen University)
Funding
Year
Dimension
6 pp
DOI
Project
Project ID
Keywords
carbon farming EU, CRCF Regulation, EU Buyers Club, carbon removals policy, sustainable agriculture financing, carbon farming certificates, Horizon Europe CAFAMORE, environmental integrity carbon markets, Scope 3 carbon reporting, agricultural carbon credits
Europe
Policy and regulatory analysis, Literature and evidence review, Stakeholder consultation, Learning-by-doing approach, Pilot testing, Experimental policy design testing, Portfolio-based financing methodology, Co-funding and blended finance approach, Environmental integrity risk assessment, MRV (Monitoring Reporting and Verification) development and testing, Pilot case methodology, Systems and market structure analysis, Comparative carbon farming activity assessment